Logo Created By VSPW Graphic Arts Program "Thank You Ladies"
VSPW INMATE FAMILY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES Friday, April 2, 2004 EXECUTIVE OUTLINE
A. Old Business
1. IFC Fliers and Membership Drive
2. Update on Mail a) Mail Room currently 7 days behind b) Time Stamping c) Delivery by Post Office d) Damaged mail e) International Reply Coupons (IRCs)
3. Vendor Packages Update/Quarterly Package Problems a) Vendor Package Problems b) New Vendors
4. Update on Medical a) Psych Diagnosed % of Population b) Dental update on Infirmary and B Yard Dental
5. Visiting a) Problems due to shortened visiting days b) Non-contact visiting for restricted minors c) Receiving Center and Ad/Seg visiting d) Regular visiting routine
6. JC Penneys and Walenhorst Catalogue availability
7. Pillow Update
B. New Business
1. New Parole Programs
2. Concerns about 602 retaliation
3. Food preparation questions
VALLEY STATE PRISON FOR WOMEN INMATE FAMILY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
Friday, April 2, 2004 Warden’s Conference Room
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Marvin Coolbaugh Nancy Rubinstein Elizabeth Muniz Louisa Camorlinga
MEMBERS/ALTERNATES ABSENT:
Wanda Patton Dr. John Videen Tammy Rust Ruby Lockett Jim Gilmore John Errante
VISITORS:
Tina Rubinstein
STAFF PRESENT:
Gloria A. Henry, Warden Javier Cavazos, Administrative Assistant Laura Hernandez, Chief Psychologist Pat Callahan, Correctional Captain Joie Austin, Secretary, Warden's Office
The meeting was called to order at 1:03 p.m.
A. OLD BUSINESS
1. IFC Fliers and Membership Drive:
We’ve got two new 8½” x 11” color fliers that have been approved. The IFC application form has been stapled to them, and we’re leaving a stack of them by the Suggestion Box in the back of the Visitor Processing Center. These new fliers are also being sent to people who inquire through our website, or to persons referred to us by families and inmates, or otherwise make contact with our group. We would also like to be able to get a copy of our fliers to the WAC. We have already had several new inquiries and contacts lately through the website, and several persons have requested IFC applications. Should we be able to fill all 15 our board positions, we plan on using a system similar to the CCWF IFC, where the extra persons form an ‘Advisory Board’ as a backup to the regular IFC Board. It would be able to meet on a different day, and would interact with the current board in a backup and advisory position.
We also have 6 new 11” x 17” color fliers to post in the Visiting areas. Captain Callahan will take them this weekend, and post them in the following places:
· On the inside of the Men and Women bathroom doors in the Visitor Processing Center. · On the inside of the Men and Women bathroom doors in the Visiting Rooms. · On the guard podiums inside each of the Visiting Rooms, to replace the old torn up fliers that are currently there.
A new half-sheet “Suggestion Box” card has also been printed, and will be taped to the Suggestion Box to replace the old card.
2. Mail
a) Mailroom Currently 7 Days Behind: Captain Callahan reported that the Mail Room is currently 7 days behind. Warden Henry explained that the institution is allowed a 7-day grace period from the time mail is received at the prison until it is to be delivered to the prisoner.
Nancy Rubinstein explained that the most common question received by the IFC is about why the mail is late. It’s recently been reported by family members that mail appears to take as long as 2½ to 3 weeks from the time it is mailed until the inmate receives the mail. It has also been recently reported by inmates that mail is taking from 10 to 14 days past the postage cancellation date before it is received. This is confusing information, given that the mailroom is apparently always within the 7-day limit. This would indicate that the Post Office is delivering mail at between 3 to 7 days from various points around California. Marvin Coolbaugh explained that he had talked to the Postmaster at Chowchilla, and that the Postmaster stated that mail was not coming in that slowly, and that 3 to 4 days maximum delivery time would be unusual, and that 7 days would be exceptionally uncommon.
b) Time Stamping Mail: The IFC offered some suggestions to staff about how it might be possible to satisfy the problem with perceived late receipt of mail.
The first suggestion was that electronic time stamping could be done on the envelopes when they were received at VSPW. That way, it would be proof positive to everyone involved how long it takes mail to get from Receiving to the inmates.
Staff stated that this would take excessive staff time. The mail comes in trays, and it doesn’t get handled until the mailroom is ready to sort and circulate it. Time stamping the incoming mail would require an extra handling point. Warden Henry explained that the mailroom tends to run short-handed because 1) they get more mail than they can keep up with, and 2) they get a lot of staff out because of illness, and sick leave means setbacks.
c) Direct Delivery from Post Office to Save Time: The IFC also suggested that perhaps the regular inmate correspondence (not money orders or legal mail) could be delivered directly to the prison to cut down on delivery time from the Post Office, in case that’s where the problem occurs in mail slowness. Warden Henry stated that the institution cannot get direct mail. She wanted to know what other prison in the state got direct mail. Nancy Rubinstein said she would find out and report back. Warden Henry went on to explain that an officer goes to the Post Office every day except Sunday to pick up the day’s mail, so there is no lag in delivery time at that point.
d) Direct Delivery Mail and Damaged Mail: Warden Henry stated that VSPW would not want to accept mail straight from the Post Office in any case. She offered an example to explain why this is so. VSPW used to be accused of stealing items from Quarterly Packages once. When the institution stopped allowing the delivery of damaged boxes from the Post Office or from UPS, the stolen items claims practically vanished. It appears that most of the missing items were from damaged boxes. In order to reduce VSPW’s liability, they now return any boxes with damages. This means that VSPW has the right to reject, at the Post Office, any mail that is damaged. They would not have this opportunity if the mail was delivered straight to the institution.
ACTION ITEM: Nancy Rubinstein will find out what other prisons in California have had direct mail service, and let the Warden know.
ACTION ITEM: Captain Callahan will contact Walkenhorst to see if a list of names of people who should have received boxes in the attempted delivery on March 31st was actually faxed to the prison. He would also check to see who gave permission for this on staff. If everything checked out, he would see about changing the status on those boxes from 2nd Quarter to 1st Quarter.
b) New Vendors
There are 3 or 4 new vendor groups that have contacted the administration and requested review to come on-board as approved providers of quarterly packages. The staff has not had time to review them. Also, Captain Callahan says that they are holding back a little bit in order to have time to straighten out problems with the existing vendors, and to wait for CDC to finalize the statewide regulations on Vendor packages. This has not happened yet, and is still up in the air.
ACTION ITEM: Nancy Rubinstein will contact the state dietician and obtain the minimum requirements and guidelines for nutrition for the CDC women’s prisons.
The meeting was adjourned at 2:20 p.m.
Next Meeting:
Friday, June 4, 2004 1:00 PM VSPW Warden’s Conference Room
Minutes prepared by Nancy Rubinstein Agenda Items for next meeting due by May 17, 2004.